Monday 22 June 2015

HMRC Pays Informants £605K


The amount of money paid to informants by HMRC, in its attempts to crack down on tax evasion, has increased by 50% to £605K.

The Guardian quotes research by City law firm RPC, noting that the payouts have risen from £402,000 in 2013-14 through greater public awareness of the potential rewards, as people working in financial or professional services increasingly join the ranks of ex-spouses or former employees in providing tip-offs.

An HMRC spokesperson said:
The majority of people who provide information to us do so without any expectation of a financial reward. Cash rewards are discretionary and based on what is brought in as a direct result of the information provided. 

We receive information from a wide variety of sources and it is always used to make sure everyone pays what they should.”

Tax does have to be taxing.

Professional Cover Against the Threat of Costly TAX and VAT Investigations

Insurance to protect you against the cost of enquiry or dispute with HMRC is available from several sources including Solar Tax Investigation Insurance.

Ken Frost has negotiated a 10% discount on any polices that may suit your needs.

However, neither Ken Frost nor HMRCISSHITE either endorses or recommends their services.

What is Solar Tax Investigation Insurance?

Solar Tax Investigation Insurance is a tax-fee protection service that will pay up to £75,000 towards your accountant's fees in the event of an HM Revenue & Customs full enquiry or dispute.

To find out more, please use this link Solar Tax Investigation Insurance



HMRC Is Shite (www.hmrcisshite.com), also available via the domain www.hmrconline.com, is brought to you by www.kenfrost.com "The Living Brand"

1 comment:

  1. I would hazard a guess that most of this was paid in connection to alcohol and tobacco evasion, rather than the evasion of other taxes. Surely finding those not paying tax is easy-expensive house, top of the range car, minimum income declared. It's not rocket science, and should be easy to investigate. Or am I missing something?

    ReplyDelete