Tuesday 13 October 2015

The Curious Case of Facebook's £4K Tax Bill


Facebook paid £4,327 in corporation tax last year, this is less than the annual cost of travel for some people commuting to London from Brighton each day and less than many taxpayers (based on the average) paid in income tax.

Despite revenues of £105M in 2014, Facebook incurred losses of £28.5M.

This loss was partly in due to £5.6M of tax losses being brought forward from the previous year, and also due to the company's finances going largely through its European headquarters in Ireland where it's able to minimise taxes through the "Double Irish" loophole.

Unsurprisingly there has been a right old hoo hah about this.

However, £35M of bonus payments were made to British staff which I assume (depending on their tax arrangements) are taxable.

That aside, those who are in a flap over this should bear in mind that Facebook has not broken the law but has used the law to minimise its taxes.

The laws that Facebook uses have been passed by our "respected" MP's. Therefore, if people do not like these laws, they should have a word with their MP's and ask them to pass laws that extract higher tax bills from Facebook.

Tax does have to be taxing.

Professional Cover Against the Threat of Costly TAX and VAT Investigations

Insurance to protect you against the cost of enquiry or dispute with HMRC is available from several sources including Solar Tax Investigation Insurance.

Ken Frost has negotiated a 10% discount on any polices that may suit your needs.

However, neither Ken Frost nor HMRCISSHITE either endorses or recommends their services.

What is Solar Tax Investigation Insurance?

Solar Tax Investigation Insurance is a tax-fee protection service that will pay up to £75,000 towards your accountant's fees in the event of an HM Revenue & Customs full enquiry or dispute.

To find out more, please use this link Solar Tax Investigation Insurance



HMRC Is Shite (www.hmrcisshite.com), also available via the domain www.hmrconline.com, is brought to you by www.kenfrost.com "The Living Brand"

1 comment:

  1. The points is that it is morally wrong , which your site seems to ignore -the MPS in question do not understand tax and are looking for jobs in many cases with the very companies avoiding tax so good luck with that -if Amazon , Google , Facebook etc may argue they pay tax on earnings of staff, NI , rates etc but the staff use schools, hospitals etc built and ran on tax their employers avoid .

    ReplyDelete